UH Football Fan Blog (where's my banner?)

 Subscribe

  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2013
  • July 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
This fan blog is unaffiliated in any way with the University of Hawaii or the Warriors football team.

Privacy Policy


Friday, June 13, 2008

Hawaii Recruiting, Idaho Law

Ferd Lewis writes about the changing, more competitive recruiting landscape in Hawaii.
UH, which in previous years was curiously reluctant to extend much in the way of early offers, has become aggressive under new head coach Greg McMackin. The Warriors, by Sullivan's count, have made at least 12 early solicitations.

That is an indication of just how competitive things have become in their backyard, where every Bowl Championship Series conference now recruits.
Dave Reardon writes that the differences between Idaho and Hawaii state law may be a factor in this Sugar Bowl problem for UH.
In the hectic days prior to the Sugar Bowl, University of Hawaii officials turned to its rival for advice. Who better? Boise State had just been to a BCS game the previous year and could give UH some pointers on how to handle the venture -- including with whom to fill its charter planes at state expense.

As it turns out, what's good for the Broncos isn't necessarily good for the Warriors. Hawaii and Idaho state laws vary when it comes to what employees are allowed to accept. Spouses and children traveling to bowl games on the public dime may be a no-no here, although not a problem in other states, including Idaho.

2 Comments:

  • At Friday, June 13, 2008 at 9:48:00 AM HST, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    I am glad that the Star-Bulletin has Dave Reardon who believes in good reporting and finding the truth instead of his boss Arnett who basically takes a "who cares?" approach to Hawaii taxpayers.

    Hawaii always needs active "watchdogs" like the Honolulu Advertiser and their approach to finding out the "why" of what is done at UH. Mind you, I am glad some areas of the State government are finally trying to get more information but why is it the Advertiser must make a "big stink" about it first?

    It is nice to see that at least Reardon is being more active into that also. All of Hawaii cares about how "our" money is spent--and for any newspaper person like Arnett to feel otherwise is like he is tired of doing his "job."

    Thank you Tombo for last nights updates on Timmy Chang. Hoping for the best for him and all the other WitPs.

     
  • At Friday, June 13, 2008 at 7:05:00 PM HST, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Tombo good stuff posting. I just got one question about the Sugar Bowl travelig. UH has legal counsel, so why didn't UH use them? Of course, UH has to follow Hawaii law. That is basic. Regardless whether you use Hawaii or Idaho law, its still income for federal tax purposes if you are not on the team. This is one of those "What the #%@?" The distiction between Hawaii and Idaho law is totally lost upon me.

     

Post a Comment

** Back to the Main Page **